Topstep vs MyFundedFutures: EOD Trailing vs Static Drawdown

Two solid futures-native firms whose numbers land closer together than the marketing suggests once you check them against the source. The real dividing line is the drawdown mechanic: Topstep's floor rises with your equity, MyFundedFutures' doesn't move at all.

Rule-by-rule comparison — 50k accounts

Rule Topstep 50k MyFundedFutures 50k
Profit target $3,000 $3,000
Max drawdown $2,000 $2,000
Drawdown type EOD trailing StaticWIN
Daily loss limit $1,000 $1,250
Consistency rule (eval) No % consistency rule on the Combine (evaluation) — instead a… None — explicit, no cap on single-day contribution.
Min trading days 10 days NoneWIN
Automation allowed Full automation permitted on the Combine (evaluation). Explicitly permitted on both the evaluation and the live funded account —…WIN
Payout split 90/10 from the first dollar for accounts created after Jan 12, 2026…WIN Not published
Best for Well-documented rule set with a stated payout structure No minimum trading days, static floor, funded-account automation

The drawdown difference — and why it matters for algos

Topstep's EOD trailing drawdown

Topstep's floor is calculated from the highest balance recorded at the end of any trading day — not intraday highs, but not fixed either. Start a day at $50,000 and close it at $51,500, and the floor moves up to $49,500 (a $2,000 trail). Give back $300 the next day without a new high close, and the floor stays put — it only ever moves up.

For a script, this means available cushion shrinks over time even without a loss: a strategy that starts with $2,000 of room above the floor eventually has less, purely because its own winning closes kept raising the bar. The strategy needs to periodically recompute how much room is actually left rather than coding to one fixed number.

MyFundedFutures' static drawdown

MyFundedFutures fixes the floor at account open and never moves it — $2,000 below the starting balance on a 50k account, for the life of the evaluation, whether the account grows to $60,000 or stays flat. That's a single constant a script can check against without ever recalculating, which is the simplest drawdown model to build around.

What this means in practice

A strategy averaging small wins on most sessions will see its Topstep cushion erode over time purely from winning — not from any mistake — while the same run of sessions leaves MyFundedFutures' floor exactly where it started. That doesn't make Topstep's structure bad; it just means position sizing on Topstep should account for a shrinking buffer as the account climbs, which MyFundedFutures never requires.

Minimum trading days and consistency

MyFundedFutures has no minimum trading days requirement at all — the source states this explicitly and repeatedly. Topstep requires 10. Neither firm caps how much of total profit a single day can represent during the evaluation: MyFundedFutures has no consistency rule of any kind, and Topstep's Combine substitutes a participation requirement (5 separate winning days of at least $200 each) rather than a percentage cap. A strategy that front-loads its whole target into one session clears MyFundedFutures cleanly but still has to show up for enough additional Topstep sessions to satisfy that day-count requirement.

Rules and account-tier lineups change — MyFundedFutures in particular has introduced several new product lines since this comparison was first drafted. Verify current terms with each firm before purchasing an evaluation.

Which firm should you choose?

Choose Topstep if…

You want a documented, stated payout structure

  • A published payout split rather than an unlisted figure
  • Longer track record and a well-known brand
  • Comfortable coding a recalculating EOD trailing floor
  • Strategy naturally trades across multiple sessions
Choose MyFundedFutures if…

You want a fixed floor and no day minimum

  • Static drawdown — one constant, never recalculated
  • No minimum trading days requirement
  • No consistency rule of any kind
  • Automation explicitly permitted on the funded account too

Where Apex fits in

If automation friction is the deciding factor above all else, Apex Trader Funding has no daily loss limit during its evaluation — the single most automation-friendly rule of the three. See the Apex vs MyFundedFutures or Apex vs Topstep comparisons for the full breakdown against each.

One script, configurable for both firms.

Drawdown floor, daily loss limit, and consistency parameters — set the values for your firm at checkout.

Frequently asked questions

Is Topstep or MyFundedFutures better for automated trading?
MyFundedFutures' static drawdown is the easier of the two to manage algorithmically — the floor is fixed once and never recalculated. Topstep's EOD trailing drawdown requires the strategy to reassess how much cushion is actually left after every session close, since the floor keeps pace with the account's highest settled balance.
Which prop firm has faster payouts — Topstep or MFF?
Neither firm's payout frequency is something we can confirm from our verified rules data — check current payout timelines directly with each firm rather than relying on a specific cadence claim, since this is exactly the kind of operational detail firms adjust without updating every page at once.
Can I use the same Pine Script on Topstep and MFF?
The entry and exit logic transfers unchanged. What needs adjusting: the daily-loss kill switch dollar amount ($1,000 vs $1,250 on a 50k account), and whether the drawdown tracker follows a static constant (MyFundedFutures) or recalculates against a rising EOD floor (Topstep). Get the drawdown-tracking logic wrong and the script either trips too early or lets risk run further than intended.